Thread: PNR versus ANR
View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:03 AM
Wingtipvortex Wingtipvortex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 25
Wingtipvortex is on a distinguished road
PNR versus ANR

I just bought my first headset, and although I settled for a cheap pair of AVCOMS the first time around, I was amazed to learn how expensive a good set can cost.

So I did some research to find out what I am paying for when I fork out a 1000 bucks for a pair of BOSE ANR's, and this is what I learned;

My 100 dollar AVCOM is a PNR headset, which means Passive Noise Reduction. The 1000 dollar Bose above is ANR, which stands for Active Noise Reduction.

Passive noise reduction is acheived by absorbing sound energy before it enters the ears, and active noise reduction is achieved by essentially balancing the noise out with MORE noise. To be fair, all ANR headsets also have PNR qualities, so the 40+ decibal reduction of these sets consist of about 20db Passive noise reduction.

On my first flight lesson I used a set of ANR Headsets and I know how comfortable it is.

However, apart from the comfort, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that from a PROTECTIVE point of view, the ANR method of reducing noise does not really protect your hearing, since the sound energy is still reaching your ears, just not in a fashion that they send legible signals to your brain.

So my AVCOM rated at 24db noise reduction, is not too bad from a protective standpoint, for 1/10th of the cost.

Hmmmm. I still want a BOSE....

Last edited by Wingtipvortex : 11-14-2007 at 04:16 AM.
Reply With Quote