Contact|RisingUp Home

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Phil is offline New Member Phil
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Mt. View, CA
    Posts
    1

    Post Mooney vs Piper Arrow

    Any thoughts on the tradeoffs between Mooney 20C/E vs Piper Arrow for first Retractable/Complex aircraft?

    Issues on cost of ownership, maintenance, insurance, etc.

    Thanks


  2. #2
    wtbfm0022 is offline New Member wtbfm0022
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1

    Post

    Phil, The Mooney is clearly the best choice. The Arrow is slower, heavierand less reliable.
    At best glide, the Mooney will go at least 2X the Arrow.

    I used to fly from LWS (N. Idaho) to Palo Alto, CA regularly, nonstop in my 1968 Mooney
    Statesman (M20G) in about 5.3 hrs.

    Concerns about the Mooney's laminar flow wing are overrated. It does NOT "fall out of the
    sky in a stall.

  3. #3
    SeaAir is offline Member SeaAir
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    49

    Post

    I don't know that I can let that stand.

    While it is true that a Mooney is faster, the Arrow has a greater range, greater payload, and is much more confortable to sit in. I personally prefer the handling of the Arrow, but either is easy to fly.

    The two airplanes are really very similar under the skin. Both use the same powerplants and have about the same maintenance problems. I have a spreadsheet showing what we spend on our Arrow (it's a Turbo Arrow III) should you be interested. Roughly, it is about $50/hr dry for maintenance and engine reserve. It burns between 11.5 and 12 gph.

    Hope that helps.

    Warren

  4. #4
    Bick is offline New Member Bick
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    2

    Post

    I have flown them both and I find the arrow to be a more relaxing and comfortable airplane to fly, albeit slower than the Mooney. The Mooney has a sports car feel whereas the Arrow is more like a family sedan. If you plan to do any instrument work the Arrow is a better instrument platform. Having said all that the choice is really a matter of personal preference and taste.

  5. #5
    Denny of Oakland is offline Super Member Denny of Oakland is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Yamagata, Japan
    Posts
    567

    Post

    From maintenance point A&P/IA view the Mooney is a much better machine to maintain. Speaking of turbo it’s more money and requires addition inspections under the cowling. That’s not a bad thing, but sometimes a leaking turbo causes severe pitting corrosion on the engine mounts, big bucks for repairs/replacement. Which, everyone you decide make sure and get a prepurchase inspection contingent on the sale.

    Denny of Oakland

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts