Go Back   RisingUp Aviation Forums > Aircraft > Aviation Law and Politics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Aviation Law and Politics Discussion about our favorite subject...

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-17-2007, 08:22 PM
Denny of Oakland Denny of Oakland is offline
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 417
Denny of Oakland is on a distinguished road
New Age 65 Into Law

FAA - Information for Operators (InFO)

An InFO contains valuable information for operators that should help them meet certain administrative, regulatory, or operational requirements with relatively low urgency or impact on safety.

Subject: President Today Signed Age 65 Into Law, Affecting Pilots Under Part 121

Purpose: This InFO announces the “Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act” (the Act), effective immediately, December 13, 2007, and highlights key provisions of the Act.

Background: In November, 2006, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) revised the maximum age for certain pilots in international operations from age 60 to age 65. Until 12/13/07, the United States, an ICAO member state, limited its pilots operating under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 121 to age 60. Now those pilots may continue until age 65, as specified in the Act.

Discussion: Key provisions of the Act include the following:

• As of 12/13/07, part 121, § 121.383(c), specifying age 60, ceases to be effective.

• A pilot age 60+ acting as pilot in command (PIC) in international operations must be paired with a pilot under age 60 (consistent with the current ICAO requirement).

• In domestic operations both pilots may be age 60+.

• It permits the continued employment of a pilot who reaches age 60 on or after 12/13/07.

• It permits the employment as a new-hire a pilot who reached age 60 before 12/13/07.

• A pilot age 60+ will not be subjected to different, greater, or more frequent medical exams.

• Any pilot age 60+ must hold a first-class medical certificate, renewable on a 6-month cycle.

• Any air carrier employing pilots age 60+ must adjust its training program to ensure such pilots’ skill and judgment continue at acceptable levels.

• Any pilot age 60+ must undergo a line check at 6-month intervals.

• For a pilot age 60+ acting as second in command (SIC), a regularly scheduled simulator evaluation may substitute for a required line check.

Recommended Action: Directors of safety, directors of operations, chief pilots, trainers, and pilots under part 121 should be aware of the Act and should collaborate immediately in implementing its provisions.
The exact language of the Act can be downloaded at the following public Web site: THOMAS (Library of Congress). In the “Search Bill Text” box click on “Bill Number,” enter “HR 4343” and click Search.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 06:40 PM
bluesideup bluesideup is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 151
bluesideup is on a distinguished road
Too bad the administrator was to gutless to act on this in a timely way more than a year ago when ICAO made it law. If she had done that I would still have a job here in the states instead of having to travel half way around the world to the filthy heathen country I am forced to work in.
I am very happy for all who will benifit from the change, no thanks to the FAA. Present company excluded of course because I know well Denny you don't make the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:21 PM
Denny of Oakland Denny of Oakland is offline
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 417
Denny of Oakland is on a distinguished road
You are right I don't make the rules, but sure wish I could (just for one day). I started a letter writing program many years ago about this stupid rule. There is quite of history of why the 60-year was picked to help a certain airline, but that is water under the bridge as many know. At least it changed, but it should of went futher in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2007, 06:28 AM
bluesideup bluesideup is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 151
bluesideup is on a distinguished road
You're right. We have another arbitrary age limit. At least it's a bit higher. Personally I think this will satisfy a lot of pilots for a long time. Still it's artificial and should be based only on proficiency and health.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.risingup.com/forums/aviation-law-politics/1830-new-age-65-into-law.html
Posted By For Type Date
OpenCongress - H.R.4343 - Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act This thread Refback 12-21-2007 09:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0